What Is Bullying? Understanding the Three Essential Indicators
Not Everything Is Bullying – Learn What Truly Defines Bullying Behavior
Watch: Jim Jordan Explains What Is Bullying
In this essential video, bullying prevention expert Jim Jordan breaks down the three critical indicators that define true bullying behavior. Understanding these indicators is crucial for parents, educators, and students to respond appropriately to different situations.
Video Description: What is Bullying? Not everything is bullying—find out what bullying really is and the three indicators to bullying.
The Critical Distinction: Not Everything Is Bullying
In today’s world, the term “bullying” is often overused. Every conflict, every disagreement, every unkind word gets labeled as bullying. While we want to take all negative peer interactions seriously, it’s crucial to understand that not everything is bullying.
Why does this distinction matter? Because different situations require different responses. Treating every conflict as bullying can:
- Overwhelm school intervention systems with incidents that don’t require intensive bullying protocols
- Minimize the experiences of true bullying victims by equating their trauma with minor conflicts
- Prevent students from developing normal conflict resolution skills
- Lead to inappropriate consequences that don’t match the behavior
- Reduce the effectiveness of genuine bullying prevention efforts
So what separates bullying from other negative behaviors? The answer lies in understanding the three essential indicators that define true bullying.
The Three Essential Indicators of Bullying
For a behavior to be classified as bullying, all three of these indicators must be present. If even one is missing, the situation may be serious and require intervention—but it’s not bullying.
The Three Indicators That Define Bullying:
1. Imbalance of Power
Bullying involves a real or perceived imbalance of power between the aggressor and the target. This power can come from various sources:
- Physical power: Size, strength, or athletic ability
- Social power: Popularity, social status, or number of friends
- Psychological power: Confidence, assertiveness, or lack of empathy
- Informational power: Possession of embarrassing information about the target
- Systemic power: Support from peers or adults, or institutional advantages
The target feels unable to defend themselves effectively due to this power differential. Without an imbalance of power, the situation is a conflict between equals, not bullying.
2. Intent to Harm
True bullying involves deliberate, intentional behavior designed to cause physical, emotional, or psychological harm. The aggressor:
- Acts purposefully to hurt, humiliate, or control the target
- Knows or should know that their behavior is harmful
- Continues the behavior despite knowing it causes distress
- Often derives satisfaction from the target’s distress
Intent distinguishes bullying from accidents, jokes that go wrong, or socially awkward behavior. If someone genuinely didn’t mean to cause harm and stops when made aware, it’s not bullying.
3. Repeated Behavior or Threat of Repetition
Bullying is not a single incident—it’s a pattern of behavior over time, or a single severe incident that creates an ongoing threat. This repetition:
- Creates a persistent climate of fear for the target
- Demonstrates that the behavior is not accidental or isolated
- Allows the power imbalance to become entrenched
- Causes cumulative psychological damage
A single mean comment, while hurtful, is not bullying. However, if that comment is part of a pattern, or if it creates an ongoing threat (such as a threat of violence), it becomes bullying.
Important note: Severe single incidents (such as serious physical assault or egregious humiliation) that create lasting impact may be considered bullying even if not repeated, particularly when they establish an ongoing threat.
What Isn’t Bullying: Understanding the Difference
Many negative behaviors are serious and require intervention, but they’re not bullying if they don’t meet all three indicators. Understanding these distinctions helps us respond appropriately.
Bullying vs. Other Negative Behaviors:
Conflict
A disagreement or argument between people of relatively equal power. Both parties are upset, and both may have contributed to the situation. Requires conflict resolution, not bullying intervention.
Meanness
Unkind or hurtful behavior that occurs occasionally without a pattern of repetition. While inappropriate, one-time mean behavior doesn’t constitute bullying. Requires correction but not intensive intervention.
Rudeness
Inadvertent or thoughtless behavior that lacks intent to harm. The person may not realize they’re being hurtful. Requires education about social skills, not bullying consequences.
Social Exclusion
Not including someone in activities. While potentially hurtful, social exclusion isn’t bullying unless it’s part of a sustained pattern designed to isolate and harm. Students have the right to choose friends.
Why These Distinctions Matter
Properly categorizing behavior allows us to:
- Apply appropriate interventions that match the severity and nature of the situation
- Teach students different skills (conflict resolution vs. reporting serious harassment)
- Allocate resources effectively to genuine bullying situations
- Maintain credibility with students who know the difference between bullying and conflict
- Preserve the seriousness of the term “bullying” for situations that truly warrant it
Real-World Examples: Applying the Three Indicators
Let’s examine specific scenarios to see how the three indicators help us identify true bullying versus other negative behaviors.
Scenario Analysis:
Example 1: Is This Bullying?
Situation: Two students of similar size and social status get into an argument during recess. They both say mean things to each other, and one pushes the other. It’s the first time they’ve had a problem.
Analysis:
- Imbalance of power? NO – They’re relatively equal
- Intent to harm? UNCLEAR – Both seem reactive rather than calculating
- Repeated behavior? NO – First incident
Conclusion: This is a conflict, not bullying. It requires adult intervention to resolve the dispute, teach conflict resolution skills, and potentially issue consequences for physical aggression—but it doesn’t require bullying protocols.
Example 2: Is This Bullying?
Situation: A popular student repeatedly makes fun of a quieter student’s clothing in front of others. This has happened multiple times over several weeks. The quiet student clearly feels uncomfortable but doesn’t respond.
Analysis:
- Imbalance of power? YES – Social power differential (popular vs. quiet)
- Intent to harm? YES – Deliberately making fun in front of others
- Repeated behavior? YES – Multiple times over weeks
Conclusion: This IS bullying. All three indicators are present. This requires comprehensive bullying intervention including consequences for the aggressor, support for the target, and ongoing monitoring.
Example 3: Is This Bullying?
Situation: A student accidentally bumps into another student in the hallway, causing them to drop their books. The student who was bumped is upset and feels embarrassed.
Analysis:
- Imbalance of power? UNCLEAR – Not enough information
- Intent to harm? NO – It was an accident
- Repeated behavior? NO – Single incident
Conclusion: This is NOT bullying. It’s an accident. The appropriate response is an apology and perhaps help picking up the books—not bullying intervention.
Why Understanding the Three Indicators Empowers Everyone
For Students
Understanding the three indicators helps students:
- Accurately identify when they’re experiencing bullying versus other negative behaviors
- Know when to use formal reporting systems versus other conflict resolution approaches
- Develop resilience for minor conflicts while getting appropriate help for serious situations
- Avoid falsely accusing others of bullying when situations are actually conflicts
For Parents
Understanding the three indicators helps parents:
- Determine when their child needs intensive advocacy versus coaching on conflict resolution
- Have more productive conversations with schools by using accurate terminology
- Teach their children the difference between bullying and normal social challenges
- Know when legal or administrative intervention may be necessary
For Educators
Understanding the three indicators helps educators:
- Triage situations appropriately and allocate resources effectively
- Apply the right interventions for different types of negative behavior
- Document incidents accurately using consistent criteria
- Explain decisions to parents and students using clear, objective standards
- Maintain the credibility of anti-bullying programs by not overusing the term
Moving Forward: Using Knowledge to Take Action
Now that you understand what bullying truly is, you’re equipped to:
- Identify bullying accurately when it occurs in your school or community
- Respond appropriately using interventions that match the situation
- Advocate effectively for targets using clear, accurate language
- Educate others about the proper definition of bullying
- Support prevention efforts that address the root causes of power-based harm
All three indicators must be present for behavior to be classified as bullying: imbalance of power, intent to harm, and repeated behavior or threat of repetition. Understanding this definition isn’t about minimizing harmful behavior—it’s about responding to each situation with the intervention it truly needs.
For more in-depth information about bullying prevention, intervention, and education, visit our comprehensive articles section.
Read More Articles
Featured Speaker: Jim Jordan
President of ReportBullying.com
With 20 years of experience in bullying prevention and intervention, Jim Jordan has become a leading voice in educating schools and communities about what truly constitutes bullying. He has authored 4 comprehensive books on bullying and is recognized by principals across the USA as the best School Anti-Bullying Speaker.
Jim’s presentations on the three indicators of bullying provide clarity that empowers students, parents, and educators to identify and respond to bullying effectively. His video explanations, like the one featured on this page, have helped thousands understand this critical distinction.
Author: Jim Jordan
Book Jim Jordan for Your School
Have Questions About What Is Bullying?
We’d love to hear from you! If you have questions about identifying bullying, applying the three indicators to specific situations, or need guidance on how to respond, please reach out.
Contact us through our website to get expert guidance on your specific situation.
Get More Information